Page 1 of 1
Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:43 pm
by Tom Javor
additional picture
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:05 pm
by Tom Javor
Here's a pic I copied from the owner's listing that gives a clearer view of the transom;

Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:10 pm
by Rachel
The ports are a better look. On the other hand, it looks like it should have had an eyebrow. That's one feature of the Dutch boats I really like (along with the spars).
I can't quite get a look at the coamings, but the DeVries Lentsch, LeComte, and Utrecht built boats I know of have distinctive rounded coaming lines at the front (where they turn from fore-and-aft to butt up against the cabin sides). They were made by splitting laminations as they came to the curve and fitting wedge-shaped pieces in. Did it have those?
I don't see any of the distinctive characteristics of the Dutch-built boats, but then I don't see enough to totally rule them out, either, although I doubt that it is. They had moved production over to the US in 1965 or so (if it is a Seafarer....) Do you have any interior shots? That might help to prove it one way or the other - there are details that I've never seen on the US boats.
Rachel
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:17 pm
by Tom Javor
my interior shots are isolateded to specific spots I felt might be issues - for some foolish reason I manage to not take overall pics of the interiors when I look at a boat.
the leading end of the coamings are solid plank with the roll you mention applied as a second piece on the outside. when I looked at this boat I realized there was a difference in how the ends finished =though I wasn't sure how the Sailmaster ones were done. I my mind the only thing I could figure out was that the coamings were cut out of a 4 or so inch thick plank - which made no sense. The idea of splitting the coaming and inserting a spacer never dawned on me.
This is a nice boat - at a good price - for someone though not for me. There is something about the first Sailmaster I looked at tht really appealed to me. As of 2 weeks back it was still on the market - I've made an inquiry to see if it's still aound....
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:45 pm
by Rachel
I know what you mean about that first one; it had something even with its problems.
Rachel
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:10 am
by Clinton B Chase
Keep us posted Tom. I'll look forward to seeing what you get....just get it already!!!! :)
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:40 am
by Tom Javor
My mind is pretty well made up - if the first Sailmaster is still available and I can reach a reasonable agreement with the owner.....
You may recall that he intended to raise the price monthly as the season approached. I guess I neded to look at several others iin order to be sure.
The Kestrel may end up in your neighborhood, the fellow from NE Sailboat Rescue is supposed to look at her today.
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:23 pm
by Rachel
Tom Javor wrote:You may recall that he intended to raise the price monthly as the season approached.
Considering the boat and the times, that would cause me a hump of annoyance to get over. On the other hand, if you like/love the boat, and it's right for your situation, then down the road perhaps you can forget that you may have "overpaid," and the seller's "Buy it by midnight tonight! Not available in stores!" type of selling philosophy, and it won't really matter in the grand scheme of things. You'll have your sweet boat, and you'll be smiling as the spars gleam golden in the afternoon light.
Of course, I may not be the person to take advice from on driving hard boat bargains; I find one I like, and I'm a powerless wimp in the haggling department.
Rachel
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:29 pm
by Brodie
Nice looking boat. I think the Sailmaster you looked at before is now down the street from me...I noticed it the other day and thought it looked familiar, with the black hull, gold cove and wooden spars. Looks like the owner moved it from whatever boatyard it was at to his house. If you come by to look at it again let me know, you'd be a mile from my Marlin if you wanted to stop by for a peek...I'm not selling :-) but I know I'd jump on most chances to ogle another pretty boat (I'm uncovering next weekend).
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:32 am
by Tom Javor
Heard back from the Sailmaster owner- boat as been sold and is now on Jamestown here in RI. Certainly hope the new owner appreciates the boat. It's my own fault, should have moved much sooner on it but wasn't sure it was the right boat. There wil be others.....
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:55 am
by Brodie
Ah...that must be why it moved. Well, I'll keep an eye on it for you! The house where it is now had an old Catalina 27 in the driveway for years which disappeared last year, now replaced by the new boat.
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:35 pm
by dee
Only have a minute, (at lunch).
The boat pictured above is a Seafarer Kestrel, and looks like a U.S. built. I don't have time to look at the plans now but I do remember a version with the head at the V-berth, and the slot in the stern for the tilt up motor. Aluminum center boards were used about this time. Toe rails don't look right... maybe replaced.
Inside photos will still reveal more info regardless of what they are of.
dee
Re: Seamaster Kestrel 22 - believed to be a 1966 or '67
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:27 pm
by dee
OK, Home now and after looking at the photos some more, I've made the following observations.
Fiberglass winch mounts = later (US) production.
Toe rails either replaced, or a production change. Even the late boats I've seen still had the bow chocks recessed and moulded into the toe rail. (Their position varied with respect to how how far back from the bow they were placed.) The toerails also look thinner than I've seen before, and they don't have that Sparkman & Stephens sweep or taper.
Other hardware is different than what I'm used to seeing. Different in that it's not the custom cast, but off the shelf variety. Could be a cost / availability issue. ( $$$).
Cockpit foot well has rear drains which the original dutch boats had, but later U.S. boats switched to forward drains. (Rear drains need less plumbing to get the water overboard, and the plumbing is way in the back of the cabin and not in the way). Maybe they went back to that idea.
Chain plates are side by side, not side by side and one inboard of the other. No big deal either way I guess... just different than Dutch built and to the original plans.
I don't care for the motor tilt up cut in the stern... just my eye.
I do like the three ports look to the cabin side and want to do the same to mine, but MAN are bronze opening ports high $$$.$$. Even small ones.
One final reflection... She is still a sweet looking design.
dee
I would still like to see other photos of the inside.
dee
interior shots
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:01 pm
by Tom Javor
as I said, these aren't much.........
sorry but no pictures of the head area or settees/berths
Companionway
under the cockpit

]
behind port quarterberth
knee to starboard
