
Larry Wilson
You're not the only one who has deadlight holes cut at the different angles. After I got my boat home, I kept noticing that one of the deadlights was twisted. I just assumed that the opening was cut oversize, and the frame was installed incorrectly. No such luck. The opening was cut 3 decrees off plane from the others and really looked bad. A not so good day for craftmanship at the Pearson factory, I guess. I have since laminated new material over the opening and recut the hole.Is it just me, or is the large port in the boat in the foreground at a completely different angle than the one in the other boat? The builders must've cut the hole for the crooked one on a Friday afternoon or something...
No, in fact I think they had been on the boat for quite some time. The mahogany was not in very good shape at the time of purchase. I have since removed them with the plan to re-apply new ones on the boat in the same location after the deck is repainted. I would like to make them continuous (instead of the breaks at the corners) but I realize that the corner pieces tend to be very fragile due to cross-grain orientation. So, I don't know if I'll do it or not. I think these were made with too delicate of a profile and that I'll increase the thickness of the molding and maybe the width. Quartersawn timber would be a big plus if one could get it. These had a lot of wild grain that accounts for their poor condition. They really seem to add a nice effect to the boat though. They would be very appealing when finished.I really like the "eyebrows" on your Triton. They really contribute to the classic part of the plastic classic. Did you add them yourself?
I am out on an airline trip right now, but will be home tomorrow night late. If you can wait a day or so, I'll get some exact measurements for you when I get home. I think that the eyebrows are about 2" or so from the upper decks, but that is just a guess. This seems to be a good place for the visual effect since it tends to "tone down" the height of the coach roof (by dividing the distance a little between the coach roof and the main deck), and makes the coach roof look thicker than it is. Also, I'd guess that they are a little less fragile an inch or so below the "corner of the decks and cabin sides. However, mine actually touch the tops of the foward portlights which looks OK but may be a little low.I plan to add eyebrows to mine as a termination-accent for where the dynel cloth ends (traditional origins of eyebrow trim). Tomorrow, coincidentally, is the day I start laying out the locations. Can you give me some dimensional sense of how far down from the edge yours are located?
I got a chance to measure the eyebrow locations today while I continued working on my cockpit reconstruction work. I laid a piece of 1X4 on the upper deck with one end extending beyond the side of the deck. Then I measured the vertical distance from the bottom of this piece of lumber to the top of the molding profile. This distance was surprisingly consistent on the upper deck at 1" and 5/8" on the lower deck. Again, it appears that the lower deck is a compromise to have the molding as low as the portlights will allow. I think one could make a simple "L" shaped jig out of scraps of lumber to mark the top of the molding along the cabin side.Can you give me some dimensional sense of how far down from the edge yours are located?